Sunday, December 2, 2007

re: Illuminati and Abrahamic beliefs and the Goddess

Duration: 07:53 minutes
Upload Time: 2007-03-02 17:44:13
User: zezt
:::: Favorites
:::: Top Videos of Day
Description:

Exploration out of the box about Illuminati, Abrahamic belief systems, Gnosticism---the theme of light versus dark, and real meaning of Goddess

Comments

dawnrun911 ::: Favorites  2007-05-02 21:03:47

You should look up "The freeman prespective" on google video..
__________________________________________________
zezt ::: Favorites  2007-05-03 04:38:25

Yes I am familiar with them. I am thought trying to explore the original suppression of Goddess and Nature by a male-supremacist mindset which then appropriates Goddess symbolism as its own, but with an anti-Nature, anti-Community intention. This would be like an earlier version of hos the Christian Church appropriated pagan symbolism as its own. They would build their Churches on sacred pagan sites, etc
__________________________________________________
luxfero ::: Favorites  2007-06-14 05:03:17

jordan maxwell is extremely ignorant and so is alex jones
__________________________________________________
zezt ::: Favorites  2007-06-14 07:03:05

why?
__________________________________________________
chironicles ::: Favorites  2007-11-23 01:44:07

I'm afraid this is a pretty 2 dimensional definition of Gnostic belief. Gnostics held that the physical world was a distraction from Self awareness, and that sense perception was largely inadequate in our seach for knowledge. They certainly weren't the nihilists you describe. The Gnostic Cathars were wiped out by the Illuminati controlled Catholic Church because of their knowledge, and they fought to the last man.
__________________________________________________
zezt ::: Favorites  2007-11-23 03:53:51

depends what you mean by 'physical world' and 'self awareness' and 'sense perception'. This is am aware of. When you survey the patriarchal belief systems and the so-called mystery school belief systems they all distrust sensual reality. to me this is stupid because we ARE sensual beings! you cannot be NOT sensual, even when having a deep 'mystical' experience
__________________________________________________
chironicles ::: Favorites  2007-11-24 02:22:05

Wisdom and intuition are subjective, non-sense perception REALITIES. Everything that we see and experience physically is limited by the abillity of the five senses to objectively observe the WHOLE universe. As quantum physics have shown, the five senses don't even come close to accomplishing this. This is why the Gnostics distrusted them.
__________________________________________________
chironicles ::: Favorites  2007-11-24 02:31:21

Also, I think you're confusing the Gnostics with the Orthodoxy itself. They refered to God simply as 'Divine Light.' They never applied gender to this definition. Sophia, the feminine archetype which was the inspiration for almost every 'Mother Goddess' in human history, was perhaps the most important part of the Gnostic myth. I would suggest reading Carl Jung's work "Archetypes of the Collective Unconscious" for a deeper understanding of Gnostic thought.
__________________________________________________
zezt ::: Favorites  2007-11-24 04:47:48

your first sentence doesn't make sense to me. 'subjective non-sense perception'. it is a contradiction that a sensual being can have a non-sensual experience! Quantum physics? they do not understand consciousness! 5 senses? hmmmm, have you had psychedelic experience by any chance?
__________________________________________________
zezt ::: Favorites  2007-11-24 05:08:49

No I am not, as i explained. For example, where the literalist reading of the Genesis myth of the Garden of Eden has the 'Serpent' as evil, Gnostic myth has the Serpent as a liberating god versus the 'evil' orthodox god! BUT...how this myth differs from the more eart-centred Goddess understanding is....that from there they claimed very creation by this 'God' was evil and a trap. See?
__________________________________________________
chironicles ::: Favorites  2007-11-24 13:43:24

Again, you are confused. You are applying Conscious material world ideas to the inner unconscious paradigm. In the unconscious, all perception is non-sense. Gnostics did not trust PHYSICAL SENSATION, because of its limitations. Intuition IS NOT PHYSICAL SENSATION. Anyone who tries to lump this in with the five senses has not done their homework.
__________________________________________________
chironicles ::: Favorites  2007-11-24 13:48:50

I think your problem here is not with the idea of Patriarchy, but the idea of Duality. I'm sorry, but man did not create duality, it has existed in nature always. Is there good and evil? I prefer Balance and Unbalance, however, how would you describe the actions of the illuminati? Is mass murder 'indifferent'. This is childish new age illusion. To deny evil as a fabrication leads to eventual vitimization by it.
__________________________________________________
zezt ::: Favorites  2007-11-24 15:36:53

and you are carrying on the psychological split trip between 'conscious' and ''the unconscious'. I am VERY aware of nonrationality-- the multidimensional experience of psychedelic reality-- and deep experiences, where we have your 'non-sense'. Clear. But of COURSE there is physical sensation. Very MUCH so.
__________________________________________________
zezt ::: Favorites  2007-11-24 15:40:48

But patriarchy are very much involved. We can also bring in 'malesupremacy' if you prefer. The male ego who struggles with his Mother? Which he defines as nature and the physical body and senses? I am NOT trying to be 'new age' and wish away evil. listen to the video again. Here me mention Monica Sjoo. Check her out. She very much exposes the so-called New Age. A MUST read!
__________________________________________________
chironicles ::: Favorites  2007-11-24 22:31:39

If your saying that there is an inbalance of masculine animus predominant in our modern world I would agree. The problem is your statement in the video that this is somehow drawn from Gnostic sources. This is simply not fact. Gnostics respected the true femenine, the archetypal feminine which exists in the unconscious. Nature has nothing to do with it. They were not the inspiration for our fundementalist times, in fact, their system is most likely the only solution to them.
__________________________________________________

No comments: