Duration: 03:08 minutes Upload Time: 06-11-17 14:52:44 User: k21desmog :::: Favorites |
|
Description:
This is a short video I made that compares the credentials of climate change "skeptic" and practicing, well published scientist that says climate change is happening and humans are to blame. It's very amatuer production, but I hope it makes the point clear that many of the people who say climate change is not happening are far from authorities in the area of climate change science. |
|
Comments | |
ChampUSC ::: Favorites Uh, may I please get some tuna free dolphin? 07-09-03 04:38:51 _____________________________________________________ | |
chpetro ::: Favorites GHG Stats with co2 base: CH4 11-12 years 4x more asorbive/ N20 150 years 200x more asorbive/ CFC's 65-130 years 11000-14000x more asorbive/ PFC's SF's HFC's 1000 years 24000x more asorbive. Please there is worse things than co2. Start thinking smart about GW. Learn your facts 07-08-15 01:59:06 _____________________________________________________ | |
thedzyan ::: Favorites CO2 is more harmful, because it stays in the atmosphere for decades. Water vapor and methane stay in the atmosphere for only a fraction of the time CO2 remains in the atmosphere. And with more CO2, which has a longer life cycle in the atmosphere, you're going to get hotter temps and that means more water vapor in the atmosphere. It's not a pretty picture. 07-08-13 21:54:55 _____________________________________________________ | |
chpetro ::: Favorites Lets look at the facts here. GHG like CO2 does emit some heat because of its absorptivity of the sun rays. There is so little we measure in Parts Per Million. Now if we look at Methane its 4x more absorptive than CO2= 4x more heat. Now if we look at water vapor its even more absorptive than CO2 and its around 4% in our atmosphere. Still think CO2 is harmful? 07-08-11 13:48:08 _____________________________________________________ | |
BobbyBBobson ::: Favorites Ok. Personally i believe in global warming. I never experienced this global cooling argument (though global warming does support a new ice age caused by a major disruption in ocean currents) I also know that warmings and coolings have occurred. Yet, during those times, the CO2 level remained consistent. It is no longer stable and HUMANS are pumping a ton of CO2 into the air Unnaturally, unlike before. 07-08-08 21:10:45 _____________________________________________________ | |
legjoints ::: Favorites If humanity chooses junk science over real science, or if we just choose to ignore the problem in the hope that it will go away, then perhaps we deserve to perish. 07-08-08 09:27:13 _____________________________________________________ | |
chrisbhackett ::: Favorites Yep ,idiot.Man is THE unnatural animal,we don`t evolve to our environment,we alter our environment to suit us,Civilisation is rapid cultural evolution that allows an easy life,safety in numbers,and economy of scale,go live in a tree, eat nuts and raw squirrel,and shit in a hole,oh yeah and switch your pc off 07-08-01 12:07:34 _____________________________________________________ | |
chrisbhackett ::: Favorites Because europe has cleaned up most of its dirty industry the lack of heat reflecting particulates in the air allowed france to get so hot thousands died. Smoke in the air would cool things down.Clear air is making middle europe too hot upto 48c last week!! bring back the pollution before we all fry!!! 07-08-01 11:57:26 _____________________________________________________ | |
Overkill884 ::: Favorites Im not an Idiot, I'm Barbaric... Barbarism is the natural state of mankind. Civilization is unnatural, it is a whim of circumstance, and barbarism must always ultimately prevail. 07-07-29 11:47:03 _____________________________________________________ | |
trusttruth1985 ::: Favorites Overkills an Idiot. 07-07-28 05:42:33 _____________________________________________________ |
Wednesday, September 5, 2007
Global Warming: junk science vs. real science
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment