creation science

	Duration: 02:19 minutes Upload Time: 06-07-12 06:09:39 User: hillsongchurch :::: Favorites
Description: why would you teach creation in school? "lets not turn them into dagerous idiots"
Comments
exposetofire ::: Favorites you lie to your childrens faces. 07-08-31 05:10:16 _____________________________________________________
sweetbilly ::: Favorites Try and understand this next statement. How can you "peer review" poorly done science????? That's my whole point, they "tell you" you are too stupid to understand it because they are too stupid to make it work, because evolution is a farce!! They treat you like a mushroom, they keep you in the closet and feed you BS to keep you happy. Evolution is just a bad theory with no facts which illustrates their inability to think. That's all. 07-08-30 12:40:38 _____________________________________________________
sweetbilly ::: Favorites What evidence? Read my posts, you don't have any evidence!! Evolution is a dead theory created by man to justify his immorality to himself. "Peer reviewed" in the face of the known facts which lead to the contrary and poor science means squat!! Unless you show me a "natural process" to control the chiral differentiation of amino acids the existence of man "IS" a miracle. You wanted proof that God exists, well there it is! 07-08-30 12:31:44 _____________________________________________________
sweetbilly ::: Favorites What "EVIDENCE", i just took away ALL your evidence in 10 posts. It's only plausible/credible to you because you don't know what you are reading and only have half of the actual facts. Creation will not only make sense of the "EXISTING" facts, it's an eloquent theory. "Peer reviewed" by who, an evolutionist?? There are plenty of peer reviewed creationist papers. 07-08-30 12:24:10 _____________________________________________________
jackfire55 ::: Favorites lol i love that vid very nice lol 07-08-30 08:19:09 _____________________________________________________
acev1per ::: Favorites do we have fossels of these animals; like with the stead progression of eyes, from light sensors, then slowly progressing till we get eyes? or do we not have proof of this yet? Because the only one I have heard about is a Natelus (or something like that), and thats a pretty advanced species... 07-08-30 07:11:45 _____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________
kenotube ::: Favorites The first eyes were not spherical objects in sockets with defined optic nerves attached to a brain. They were a few mutant cells that had the ability to interpret light in very crude ways. The first animals with eyes was 500 million years ago. That's an awful lot of generations for refinement via evolution. 07-08-30 02:54:37 _____________________________________________________
acev1per ::: Favorites umm, not really; I was just using it as an example... But I wont say its impossible... since we dont know the true answer, then everything is a possibility; 07-08-29 17:49:10 _____________________________________________________
ExgamerLegends ::: Favorites Hey i heard of this theory before lol. Actually it's kinda The same. If we were just programming then we would still be real. We'd be real programming right? And that would technically mean that creation is right sense we were created by a programmer. So do you actually believe the programming thing or no? 07-08-29 14:13:00 _____________________________________________________
acev1per ::: Favorites Well, lets say we actually dont exist; Our reality is a programed reality in some video game made in the year 2000000; which is soo realistic, that its code think they are actually real... In this case, both creationists and evolutionists are wrong... hehe, this will make your head hurt :P 07-08-28 20:57:17 _____________________________________________________